4000 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 485 South Hollywood, FL 33021
CALL US TODAY: (954) 966-2112

News & Resources

Professional Practices: Choosing The Best Entity For Tax And Asset Protection

August 27, 2019 | Category: Asset Protection, Corporate and Taxation, News

Professional Practices: Choosing The Best Entity For Tax And Asset Protection

Copyright © 2019 Robert M. Kramer

Drs. Jose Smith and Ryan Abraham, fed up with the bureaucracy of their large group practice, left to start a new practice together. They consulted their tax attorney for advice as to the best entity for tax and asset protection.

Here’s what the lawyer said.

Without making this overly complicated, we will only consider a corporation (“P.A.”) and a professional limited liability company (“P.L.”).  In both cases, we will consider the effect on “inside liability” and “outside liability.”  We will also consider whether the chosen entity should be taxed as a partnership, “S” corporation or as a “C” corporation.

When an entity is sued (such as when a doctor-employee allegedly committed malpractice), the choice of entity does not matter.  Liability is liability.  Entity liability is sometimes referred to as “inside liability.”  All assets of the entity are vulnerable except for those assets in which a bank or other creditor has a security interest.

The key is to keep the operating entity with limited assets.  Real estate and equipment should be owned by another entity and leased to the operating entity. Cash should not be allowed to accumulate and receivables should be kept to a minimum.  Some practices have set up a management company to perform administrative/ management services.  As part of this arrangement, the management company has a security interest in the operating entity’s assets.

We now need to consider “outside liability.”  Should either Dr. Smith or Dr. Abraham be sued for a matter unrelated to the practice (e.g., automobile accident occurring on a personal errand, bad investment, etc.), we need to protect their ownership interest in the practice.

Stock in a professional association or a corporation is vulnerable.  A membership interest in a P.L. is a far better choice.  Here, the creditor’s sole right is to obtain a “charging order.” This only allows the creditor the right to intercept distributions, if any, from the P.L.   This usually induces the creditor to work out a settlement quite favorable to the debtor- member.

Thus we have determined that the organizational entity should be a P.L.  The next question is whether it should be a partnership, an “S” corporation or a “C” corporation, for tax purposes.

Because taxable income of a “C” corporation is taxed at the Federal level at a flat 21 percent (21%), this is an intriguing possibility. However, this would involve accumulating profits in the entity instead of distributing the profits in the form of additional compensation, which is not a good idea.

Now we are down to either a partnership or an “S” corporation.

All partnership income attributable to a trade or business is subject to Self-Employment Tax/ Medicare Tax of 15.3 percent on the first $132,900, then 2.9 percent up to $200,000 for single filers / $250,000 for married filing jointly; and 3.8 percent thereafter.  It does not matter if the payment is from a guaranteed payment or from profits of the trade or business.  All of it is subject to these taxes.

The “S” corporation has the best of all worlds.  All wages are subject to Social Security Tax up to the taxable wages base of $132,900 at the rate of 6.2 percent for both the employer and employee. Then there is Medicare tax of 1.45 percent for both the employer and employee with no maximum. The 0.9 percent tax on the employee applies to wages over $200,000 for single filers/$250,000 for married filers.

In contrast, the allocable share of profits to the shareholder (i.e., dividends), are not subject to the 3.8 percent Medicare tax at all.  Some individuals have tried to game the system by taking minimal or no compensation and thus trying to avoid or reduce both Social Security and Medicare taxes.  In such event, the IRS can reallocate the profits to wages.

Therefore, the most tax efficient/ asset protection entity is a professional limited liability company that has made an “S” election.

 

 

 

Material presented on the Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. website is intended for information purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed as such. The material presented on this site is included with the understanding and agreement that Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A.is not engaged in rendering legal or other professional services by posting said material. The services of a competent professional should be sought if legal or other specific expert assistance is required. Any unauthorized use of material contained herein is at the user’s own risk. Transmission of the information and material herein is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an agreement to create an attorney-client relationship with Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. or any member thereof. This website is not intended to be advertising and Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this website in any state or jurisdiction where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules. This website is not intended to constitute legal advice or the provision of legal services. By posting and/or maintaining this website and its contents, Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. does not intend to solicit legal business from clients located in states or jurisdictions where Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. or its individual attorneys are not licensed or authorized to practice law. Some links within this website may lead to other sites. Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or otherwise approve of the materials appearing in such sites.

© Copyright 2015 Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene and Buchsbaum, P.A. All Rights Reserved. Sitemap | Law Firm Essentials by PaperStreet Web Design